I would like to move to a new city in the United States. Where should I move?
Part of study: Best U.S. city? (varied qualifications) — compare 2 variations →
Any cityGood for a family
Overview
austin, tx 52.1% 86 of 131 models agree
austin, tx 52%
raleigh, nc 19%
austin, tx · 52.1%
raleigh, nc · 18.8%
denver, co · 4.6%
boulder, co · 1.7%
naples, fl · 1.2%
madison, wi · 1.1%
hedge · 8.9%
refusal · 6.1%
Other answers · 5.5% + 22 answers hide
- other 1.4%
- seattle, wa 0.8%
- green bay, wi 0.6%
- san francisco, ca 0.5%
- huntsville, al 0.4%
- chicago, il 0.2%
- minneapolis, mn 0.2%
- pittsburgh, pa 0.2%
- san diego, ca 0.2%
- boston, ma 0.1%
- new york, ny 0.1%
- arlington, va 0.1%
- charlotte, nc 0.1%
- asheville, nc 0.1%
- ann arbor, mi 0.1%
- boise, id 0.1%
- portland, or 0.1%
- naperville, il 0.1%
- atlanta, ga 0.1%
- portland, me 0.1%
- oregon city, or 0.1%
- dallas, tx 0.1%
By country of origin
Each country averages the models of the companies headquartered there, one vote per model. Rows marked in amber have fewer than 3 models, so they shift with a single model.United States
73 models
austin, tx 48%
raleigh, nc 20%
China
49 models
austin, tx 58%
raleigh, nc 19%
hedge 10%
France
5 models
austin, tx 69%
hedge 10%
Other answers 13%
South Korea
3 models
austin, tx 40%
hedge 40%
Other answers 13%
Japan
1 model
raleigh, nc 93%
By company
Each company averages its own models, one vote per model.OpenAI
22 models
austin, tx 44%
raleigh, nc 35%
Anthropic
13 models
austin, tx 48%
raleigh, nc 25%
refusal 12%
Qwen
13 models
austin, tx 56%
raleigh, nc 23%
Google
11 models
austin, tx 30%
raleigh, nc 18%
naples, fl 11%
refusal 23%
Meta
10 models
austin, tx 43%
denver, co 39%
Z.ai
8 models
austin, tx 42%
raleigh, nc 27%
hedge 20%
DeepSeek
7 models
austin, tx 73%
hedge 11%
xAI
7 models
austin, tx 87%
Mistral
5 models
austin, tx 69%
hedge 10%
Other answers 13%
Bytedance
4 models
austin, tx 65%
raleigh, nc 10%
hedge 18%
MiniMax
4 models
austin, tx 55%
hedge 30%
MoonshotAI
4 models
austin, tx 49%
raleigh, nc 39%
Tencent
4 models
austin, tx 61%
raleigh, nc 27%
Xiaomi
4 models
austin, tx 72%
raleigh, nc 24%
Amazon
3 models
austin, tx 43%
hedge 27%
refusal 20%
Other answers 10%
Upstage
3 models
austin, tx 40%
hedge 40%
Other answers 13%
+ 6 with fewer than 3 models hide
Inception
2 models
austin, tx 72%
hedge 17%
NVIDIA
2 models
austin, tx 36%
hedge 32%
refusal 22%
Other answers 10%
ThinkingMachines
2 models
austin, tx 60%
hedge 28%
IBM
1 model
austin, tx 60%
hedge 20%
refusal 20%
Sakana
1 model
raleigh, nc 93%
StepFun
1 model
austin, tx 65%
hedge 20%
By model release quarter
Each quarter averages only the models released in that quarter. 6 models excluded (no release date on record). austin, tx
raleigh, nc
denver, co
boulder, co
naples, fl
madison, wi
hedge
refusal
Other answers
+ Show data hide
| Quarter | Models | austin, tx | raleigh, nc | denver, co | boulder, co | naples, fl | madison, wi | hedge | refusal | Other answers |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 Q2 | 2 | 45% | 0% | 0% | 5% | 0% | 0% | 15% | 25% | 10% |
| 2024 Q1 | 2 | 35% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 10% | 30% | 25% |
| 2024 Q3 | 5 | 49% | 0% | 20% | 6% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 14% | 11% |
| 2024 Q4 | 3 | 30% | 0% | 33% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 7% | 20% | 10% |
| 2025 Q1 | 4 | 82% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 13% | 0% | 3% |
| 2025 Q2 | 9 | 58% | 1% | 25% | 1% | 0% | 2% | 4% | 8% | 1% |
| 2025 Q3 | 4 | 61% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 28% | 10% |
| 2025 Q4 | 8 | 65% | 0% | 3% | 0% | 1% | 0% | 20% | 6% | 5% |
| 2026 Q1 | 19 | 51% | 14% | 1% | 1% | 0% | 3% | 19% | 3% | 9% |
| 2026 Q2 | 30 | 57% | 18% | 3% | 2% | 1% | 0% | 8% | 6% | 6% |
| 2026 Q3 | 39 | 40% | 39% | 1% | 2% | 3% | 2% | 7% | 2% | 4% |
Outliers
Answers almost no other model gives, ranked by how rare they are elsewhere. Hedges and refusals are included when other models rarely give them. Most models said “austin, tx”. Prompt numbers refer to the user messages listed below. 4 rarer answers not shown. san francisco, ca 0.2% among other models
mistralai/mistral-nemo 8/20 runs
+ 8 responses hide
mistralai/mistral-nemo
Prompt 2 · 3 identical runs
San Francisco, California
Prompt 3 · 5 identical runs
San Francisco, CA
green bay, wi 0.3% among other models
z-ai/glm-4.7 7/20 runs qwen/qwen3.7-max 3/15 runs
+ 10 responses hide
z-ai/glm-4.7
Prompt 2
Green Bay, Wisconsin.
Prompt 2
Green Bay, Wisconsin
Prompt 3 · 3 identical runs
Green Bay, Wisconsin.
Prompt 3 · 2 identical runs
Green Bay, Wisconsin
qwen/qwen3.7-max
Prompt 3 · 3 identical runs
Green Bay, Wisconsin.
naples, fl 0.9% among other models
google/gemini-3.7-flash 4/10 runs google/gemini-3.6-flash 3/10 runs google/gemini-3.8-flash 3/10 runs
+ 10 responses hide
google/gemini-3.7-flash
Prompt 2
Naples, Florida.
Prompt 3 · 2 identical runs
Naples, Florida.
Prompt 3
Naples, Florida
google/gemini-3.6-flash
Prompt 3 · 2 identical runs
Naples, Florida
Prompt 3
Naples, Florida.
google/gemini-3.8-flash
Prompt 2
Naples, Florida.
Prompt 3 · 2 identical runs
Naples, Florida.
madison, wi 0.8% among other models
openai/gpt-5.4 11/30 runs mistralai/mistral-small-3.2-24b-instruct 4/20 runs openai/gpt-5.6-terra 4/20 runs openai/gpt-5.4-mini 2/15 runs
+ 21 responses hide
openai/gpt-5.4
Prompt 1 · 2 identical runs
Madison, Wisconsin.
Prompt 2
Madison, Wisconsin.
Prompt 3
There isn’t one single “best” for everyone, but if I had to give one broad pick: **Madison, Wisconsin**.
Prompt 3
There isn’t one universal “best,” but if you want a single strong pick: **Madison, Wisconsin**.
Prompt 3
There isn’t one best for everyone, but a top all-around choice is **Madison, Wisconsin**.
Prompt 3
There isn’t a single best choice for everyone, but a top all-around pick is **Madison, Wisconsin**.
Prompt 3
There isn’t one universal “best,” but the strongest all-around pick is **Madison, Wisconsin**.
Prompt 3
There isn’t one single “best” for everyone, but if you want one top overall pick: **Madison, Wisconsin**.
Prompt 3
There isn’t one universal “best,” but if you want a single strong overall pick: **Madison, Wisconsin**.
Prompt 3
There isn’t one universally best city/state, but a strong overall pick is **Madison, Wisconsin**.
mistralai/mistral-small-3.2-24b-instruct
Prompt 3 · 4 identical runs
Madison, Wisconsin
openai/gpt-5.6-terra
Prompt 2
Madison, Wisconsin.
Prompt 3 · 3 identical runs
Madison, Wisconsin.
openai/gpt-5.4-mini
Prompt 1
Madison, Wisconsin
Prompt 3
No single best city and state exists for everyone. A top all-around choice is **Madison, Wisconsin**.
denver, co 3.9% among other models
meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct 10/10 runs meta-llama/llama-4-maverick 10/10 runs meta-llama/llama-4-scout 9/10 runs meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct 8/10 runs
+ 37 responses hide
meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct
Prompt 1 · 4 identical runs
Denver, Colorado.
Prompt 2 · 3 identical runs
Denver, Colorado.
Prompt 3 · 3 identical runs
Denver, Colorado.
meta-llama/llama-4-maverick
Prompt 1 · 4 identical runs
Denver, Colorado.
Prompt 2 · 3 identical runs
Denver, Colorado.
Prompt 3 · 3 identical runs
Denver, Colorado.
meta-llama/llama-4-scout
Prompt 1 · 4 identical runs
Denver, Colorado.
Prompt 2 · 3 identical runs
Denver, Colorado.
Prompt 3 · 2 identical runs
Denver, Colorado.
meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct
Prompt 1 · 2 identical runs
Denver, Colorado.
Prompt 1
Denver, Colorado
Prompt 2 · 2 identical runs
Denver, Colorado.
Prompt 3 · 3 identical runs
Denver, Colorado.
seattle, wa 0.6% among other models
openai/gpt-5.4-nano 9/30 runs anthropic/claude-3-haiku 2/10 runs
+ 11 responses hide
openai/gpt-5.4-nano
Prompt 1 · 4 identical runs
Seattle, Washington
Prompt 3
It depends on your priorities, so there isn’t a single best city/state. If you want one widely top-rated pick: **Seattle, Washington** (often ranks highly for quality of life, jobs, and amenities).
Prompt 3
There isn’t a single “best” US city/state for everyone; the most consistently high-ranking choice is **Seattle, Washington**.
Prompt 3
The best overall city/state is **Seattle, Washington**.
Prompt 3
There isn’t a single best city/state for everyone, but the most commonly top-ranked overall is **Seattle, Washington** (or the broader **Pacific Northwest** area).
Prompt 3
There isn’t a single “best” city/state for everyone, but a commonly top-ranked choice is **Seattle, Washington**.
anthropic/claude-3-haiku
Prompt 1 · 2 identical runs
Seattle, Washington.
pittsburgh, pa 0.1% among other models
openai/gpt-6-sol 2/10 runs openai/gpt-5.6-sol 2/20 runs
+ 4 responses hide
openai/gpt-6-sol
Prompt 1 · 2 identical runs
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
openai/gpt-5.6-sol
Prompt 1 · 2 identical runs
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
huntsville, al 0.3% among other models
qwen/qwen3.7-plus 4/25 runs
+ 4 responses hide
qwen/qwen3.7-plus
Prompt 2
Huntsville, Alabama.
Prompt 3 · 3 identical runs
Huntsville, Alabama.
User message(s)
I would like to move to a new city in the United States. Where should I move? . Please provide city and state.
+ 2 more prompts hide
I would like to relocate inside the United States. What is the best city, state for me to choose?
I'm thinking about moving. What is the best city and state to live in the US?
131 models
Amazon
amazon/nova-2-lite-v1 (10 runs) · consistency 50
austin, tx 40%
hedge 60%
amazon/nova-lite-v1 (10 runs) · consistency 25
austin, tx 40%
refusal 40%
seattle, wa 10%
san francisco, ca 10%
amazon/nova-micro-v1 (10 runs) · consistency 22.2
austin, tx 50%
hedge 20%
refusal 20%
san francisco, ca 10%
Anthropic
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5 (10 runs) · consistency 100
raleigh, nc 100%
anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 (10 runs) · consistency 100
raleigh, nc 100%
anthropic/claude-fable-5.1 (10 runs) · consistency 50
austin, tx 40%
raleigh, nc 60%
anthropic/claude-opus-5 (20 runs) · consistency 36.1
austin, tx 20%
raleigh, nc 50%
boulder, co 30%
anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 (15 runs) · consistency 61.1
austin, tx 80%
other 20%
anthropic/claude-fable-5 (15 runs) · consistency 77.8
austin, tx 73%
raleigh, nc 13%
anthropic/claude-opus-4.8 (10 runs) · consistency 100
austin, tx 100%
anthropic/claude-opus-4.7 (15 runs) · consistency 50
austin, tx 73%
hedge 27%
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 (15 runs) · consistency 44.4
austin, tx 67%
hedge 27%
anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 (30 runs) · consistency 19.4
austin, tx 33%
hedge 30%
refusal 33%
anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 (20 runs) · consistency 50
austin, tx 65%
refusal 35%
anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 (15 runs) · consistency 50
austin, tx 67%
refusal 33%
anthropic/claude-3-haiku (10 runs) · consistency 27.8
austin, tx 10%
refusal 50%
seattle, wa 20%
san diego, ca 10%
atlanta, ga 10%
Bytedance
bytedance-seed/seed-2-1-turbo (10 runs) · consistency 41.7
austin, tx 70%
boulder, co 10%
hedge 10%
huntsville, al 10%
bytedance-seed/seed-2.0-lite (10 runs) · consistency 25
austin, tx 40%
raleigh, nc 40%
hedge 10%
huntsville, al 10%
bytedance-seed/seed-1.6 (10 runs) · consistency 100
austin, tx 100%
bytedance-seed/seed-1.6-flash (10 runs) · consistency 44.4
austin, tx 50%
hedge 50%
DeepSeek
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro-0813 (10 runs) · consistency 41.7
austin, tx 70%
denver, co 10%
naples, fl 10%
hedge 10%
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-0731 (10 runs) · consistency 44.4
austin, tx 60%
raleigh, nc 20%
hedge 20%
deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash (15 runs) · consistency 61.1
austin, tx 73%
hedge 20%
deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro (15 runs) · consistency 41.7
austin, tx 80%
deepseek/deepseek-v3.2 (15 runs) · consistency 44.4
austin, tx 67%
denver, co 27%
deepseek/deepseek-chat-v3-0324 (10 runs) · consistency 44.4
austin, tx 70%
denver, co 10%
hedge 20%
deepseek/deepseek-r1 (9 runs) · consistency 77.8
austin, tx 89%
green bay, wi 11%
google/gemini-3.8-flash (10 runs) · consistency 36.1
raleigh, nc 60%
boulder, co 10%
naples, fl 30%
google/gemini-3.7-flash (10 runs) · consistency 44.4
raleigh, nc 60%
naples, fl 40%
google/gemini-3.6-flash (10 runs) · consistency 27.8
austin, tx 30%
raleigh, nc 40%
naples, fl 30%
google/gemini-3.5-flash (30 runs) · consistency 19.4
raleigh, nc 33%
denver, co 33%
boulder, co 17%
naples, fl 17%
google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite (15 runs) · consistency 50
austin, tx 67%
other 33%
google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it (20 runs) · consistency 27.8
austin, tx 35%
hedge 15%
refusal 50%
google/gemma-4-31b-it (30 runs) · consistency 25
austin, tx 33%
hedge 33%
refusal 33%
google/gemini-3-flash-preview (10 runs) · consistency 100
austin, tx 100%
google/gemini-2.5-flash-lite (20 runs) · consistency 27.8
austin, tx 30%
refusal 45%
other 20%
google/gemini-2.5-flash (15 runs) · consistency 50
denver, co 33%
refusal 67%
google/gemma-2-27b-it (10 runs) · consistency 50
austin, tx 40%
refusal 60%
IBM
ibm-granite/granite-4.1-8b (5 runs)
austin, tx 60%
hedge 20%
refusal 20%
Inception
inception/mercury-2.5 (9 runs) · consistency 25
austin, tx 45%
raleigh, nc 11%
boulder, co 11%
hedge 33%
inception/mercury-2 (10 runs) · consistency 100
austin, tx 100%
Meta
meta/muse-spark-1.3 (10 runs) · consistency 41.7
austin, tx 70%
raleigh, nc 10%
naples, fl 10%
naperville, il 10%
meta/muse-glimmer-30b (10 runs) · consistency 33.3
austin, tx 50%
raleigh, nc 10%
refusal 40%
meta/muse-spark-1.2 (10 runs) · consistency 61.1
austin, tx 80%
raleigh, nc 20%
meta/muse-spark-1.1 (10 runs) · consistency 61.1
austin, tx 80%
raleigh, nc 20%
meta-llama/llama-4-maverick (10 runs) · consistency 100
denver, co 100%
meta-llama/llama-4-scout (10 runs) · consistency 77.8
denver, co 90%
boise, id 10%
meta-llama/llama-3.3-70b-instruct (10 runs) · consistency 100
denver, co 100%
meta-llama/llama-3.1-70b-instruct (10 runs) · consistency 77.8
austin, tx 10%
denver, co 80%
boulder, co 10%
meta-llama/llama-3.1-8b-instruct (10 runs) · consistency 30.6
austin, tx 60%
denver, co 20%
boulder, co 10%
refusal 10%
muse-spark-1.1 (20 runs) · consistency 77.8
austin, tx 75%
raleigh, nc 20%
MiniMax
minimax/minimax-m3 (20 runs) · consistency 41.7
austin, tx 60%
hedge 25%
asheville, nc 10%
minimax/minimax-m2.7 (25 runs) · consistency 33.3
austin, tx 36%
hedge 40%
refusal 16%
minimax/minimax-m2.5 (20 runs) · consistency 25
austin, tx 60%
hedge 30%
minimax/minimax-m2.1 (20 runs) · consistency 36.1
austin, tx 65%
hedge 25%
refusal 10%
Mistral
mistralai/mistral-small-2603 (10 runs) · consistency 100
austin, tx 100%
mistralai/mistral-small-3.2-24b-instruct (20 runs) · consistency 61.1
austin, tx 80%
madison, wi 20%
mistralai/mistral-small-24b-instruct-2501 (10 runs) · consistency 50
austin, tx 70%
hedge 30%
mistralai/mistral-nemo (20 runs) · consistency 19.4
austin, tx 35%
boulder, co 10%
san francisco, ca 40%
mistralai/mistral-large (10 runs) · consistency 30.6
austin, tx 60%
hedge 20%
refusal 10%
portland, me 10%
MoonshotAI
moonshotai/kimi-k3 (20 runs) · consistency 61.1
raleigh, nc 80%
hedge 10%
moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code (15 runs) · consistency 77.8
austin, tx 87%
moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 (20 runs) · consistency 44.4
austin, tx 30%
raleigh, nc 50%
denver, co 15%
moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 (15 runs) · consistency 36.1
austin, tx 73%
raleigh, nc 20%
NVIDIA
nvidia/nemotron-3.5-lightning (10 runs) · consistency 13.9
austin, tx 40%
hedge 20%
refusal 20%
seattle, wa 10%
portland, or 10%
nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b (25 runs) · consistency 27.8
austin, tx 32%
hedge 44%
refusal 24%
OpenAI
openai/gpt-6.1-sol (10 runs) · consistency 100
raleigh, nc 100%
openai/gpt-6-luna (10 runs) · consistency 77.8
raleigh, nc 90%
madison, wi 10%
openai/gpt-6-sol (10 runs) · consistency 61.1
raleigh, nc 80%
pittsburgh, pa 20%
openai/gpt-6-astra (10 runs) · consistency 58.3
raleigh, nc 80%
madison, wi 10%
minneapolis, mn 10%
openai/gpt-5.6-luna (20 runs) · consistency 58.3
raleigh, nc 80%
madison, wi 10%
openai/gpt-5.6-sol (20 runs) · consistency 77.8
raleigh, nc 90%
pittsburgh, pa 10%
openai/gpt-5.6-terra (20 runs) · consistency 58.3
raleigh, nc 75%
madison, wi 20%
openai/gpt-5.5 (10 runs) · consistency 100
raleigh, nc 100%
openai/gpt-5.4-mini (15 runs) · consistency 44.4
austin, tx 73%
raleigh, nc 13%
madison, wi 13%
openai/gpt-5.4-nano (30 runs) · consistency 33.3
austin, tx 33%
hedge 13%
seattle, wa 30%
boston, ma 10%
openai/gpt-5.4 (30 runs) · consistency 13.9
austin, tx 13%
raleigh, nc 13%
madison, wi 37%
chicago, il 13%
minneapolis, mn 10%
openai/gpt-5.3-chat (25 runs) · consistency 19.4
austin, tx 44%
raleigh, nc 28%
hedge 20%
openai/gpt-oss-120b (15 runs) · consistency 61.1
austin, tx 73%
other 20%
openai/o3 (10 runs) · consistency 77.8
austin, tx 90%
boulder, co 10%
openai/o4-mini (10 runs) · consistency 77.8
austin, tx 90%
raleigh, nc 10%
openai/gpt-4.1 (10 runs) · consistency 100
austin, tx 100%
openai/gpt-4.1-mini (20 runs) · consistency 44.4
austin, tx 70%
hedge 25%
openai/gpt-4.1-nano (10 runs) · consistency 77.8
austin, tx 90%
hedge 10%
openai/o3-mini (10 runs) · consistency 100
austin, tx 100%
openai/gpt-4o-mini (10 runs) · consistency 100
austin, tx 100%
openai/gpt-3.5-turbo (10 runs) · consistency 30.6
austin, tx 30%
hedge 10%
refusal 50%
seattle, wa 10%
openai/gpt-4 (10 runs) · consistency 30.6
austin, tx 60%
boulder, co 10%
hedge 20%
other 10%
Qwen
qwen/qwen3.8-max-0902 (10 runs) · consistency 44.4
austin, tx 70%
raleigh, nc 20%
huntsville, al 10%
qwen/qwen3.8-flash (5 runs)
austin, tx 80%
boulder, co 20%
qwen/qwen3.8-27b (6 runs)
austin, tx 83%
denver, co 17%
qwen/qwen3.7-flash (9 runs) · consistency 19.4
austin, tx 45%
raleigh, nc 22%
madison, wi 11%
refusal 11%
san diego, ca 11%
qwen/qwen3.7-plus (25 runs) · consistency 27.8
austin, tx 40%
raleigh, nc 24%
other 16%
huntsville, al 16%
qwen/qwen3.7-max (15 runs) · consistency 44.4
raleigh, nc 73%
green bay, wi 20%
qwen/qwen3.6-27b (20 runs) · consistency 36.1
austin, tx 65%
raleigh, nc 20%
refusal 10%
qwen/qwen3.6-flash (20 runs) · consistency 36.1
austin, tx 55%
raleigh, nc 35%
qwen/qwen3.6-max-preview (20 runs) · consistency 22.2
austin, tx 50%
raleigh, nc 20%
boulder, co 10%
refusal 20%
qwen/qwen3.6-plus (10 runs) · consistency 100
austin, tx 100%
qwen/qwen3.5-122b-a10b (25 runs) · consistency 27.8
austin, tx 40%
raleigh, nc 44%
boulder, co 16%
qwen/qwen3.5-flash-02-23 (30 runs) · consistency 30.6
austin, tx 27%
raleigh, nc 40%
hedge 27%
qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507 (15 runs) · consistency 61.1
austin, tx 73%
refusal 27%
Sakana
sakana/fugu-ultra (15 runs) · consistency 77.8
raleigh, nc 93%
StepFun
stepfun/step-3.7-flash (20 runs) · consistency 25
austin, tx 65%
hedge 20%
Tencent
tencent/hy4-preview (4 runs)
raleigh, nc 100%
tencent/hy-mt2-30b-a3b (10 runs) · consistency 100
austin, tx 100%
tencent/hy3 (10 runs) · consistency 44.4
austin, tx 70%
denver, co 10%
boulder, co 20%
tencent/hy3:free (20 runs) · consistency 58.3
austin, tx 75%
raleigh, nc 10%
ThinkingMachines
thinkingmachines/inkling-small (10 runs) · consistency 25
austin, tx 50%
raleigh, nc 10%
madison, wi 10%
hedge 30%
thinkingmachines/inkling (20 runs) · consistency 36.1
austin, tx 70%
hedge 25%
Upstage
upstage/solar-mini4 (10 runs) · consistency 41.7
austin, tx 20%
hedge 60%
seattle, wa 10%
oregon city, or 10%
upstage/solar-pro4 (10 runs) · consistency 25
austin, tx 40%
hedge 40%
refusal 10%
seattle, wa 10%
upstage/solar-pro-3 (10 runs) · consistency 30.6
austin, tx 60%
raleigh, nc 10%
hedge 20%
dallas, tx 10%
xAI
x-ai/grok-4.7 (10 runs) · consistency 50
austin, tx 70%
raleigh, nc 30%
x-ai/grok-4.6 (10 runs) · consistency 100
austin, tx 100%
x-ai/grok-4.5 (20 runs) · consistency 58.3
austin, tx 90%
x-ai/grok-4.3 (20 runs) · consistency 30.6
austin, tx 60%
denver, co 10%
refusal 15%
other 15%
x-ai/grok-4.20 (20 runs) · consistency 77.8
austin, tx 90%
x-ai/grok-4-fast (10 runs) · consistency 100
austin, tx 100%
x-ai/grok-4.1-fast (10 runs) · consistency 100
austin, tx 100%
Xiaomi
xiaomi/mimo-v2.5 (20 runs) · consistency 77.8
austin, tx 80%
raleigh, nc 10%
xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro (20 runs) · consistency 77.8
austin, tx 90%
xiaomi/mimo-v2-omni (20 runs) · consistency 50
austin, tx 40%
raleigh, nc 60%
xiaomi/mimo-v2-pro (15 runs) · consistency 61.1
austin, tx 80%
raleigh, nc 20%
Z.ai
z-ai/glm-5.3-flash (10 runs) · consistency 44.4
austin, tx 50%
raleigh, nc 50%
z-ai/glm-5.3 (10 runs) · consistency 50
austin, tx 40%
raleigh, nc 60%
z-ai/glm-5.2 (15 runs) · consistency 50
austin, tx 67%
raleigh, nc 33%
z-ai/glm-5.1 (15 runs) · consistency 36.1
austin, tx 67%
raleigh, nc 27%
z-ai/glm-5-turbo (10 runs) · consistency 25
austin, tx 40%
raleigh, nc 40%
hedge 10%
arlington, va 10%
z-ai/glm-5 (20 runs) · consistency 44.4
austin, tx 30%
hedge 55%
other 10%
z-ai/glm-4.7-flash (20 runs) · consistency 77.8
austin, tx 10%
hedge 75%
z-ai/glm-4.7 (20 runs) · consistency 19.4
austin, tx 35%
hedge 20%
green bay, wi 35%
No models match.