← All questions

We are expecting a baby boy. What should we name him?

Overview

liam 21.9% 20 of 83 models agree
liam 22%
james 18%
leo 13%
Other answers 13%
liam · 21.9%
james · 18.3%
leo · 13.1%
oliver · 9.9%
ethan · 8.6%
theodore · 5.3%
elias · 4.6%
alexander · 4.5%
hedge · 0.9%
Other answers · 13% + 20 answers
  • noah 2.8%
  • julian 2.2%
  • henry 1.7%
  • arthur 1.4%
  • other 1.1%
  • william 1%
  • eliot 0.8%
  • theo 0.7%
  • lucas 0.2%
  • luca 0.1%
  • max 0.1%
  • adrian 0.1%
  • mateo 0.1%
  • eli 0.1%
  • daniel 0.1%
  • leon 0.1%
  • jaeheon 0.1%
  • aiden 0.1%
  • joonwoo 0.1%
  • joshua 0.1%

By country of origin

Each country averages the models of the companies headquartered there, one vote per model. Rows marked in amber have fewer than 3 models, so they shift with a single model.
United States
44 models
liam 24%
james 13%
leo 14%
Other answers 17%
China
32 models
liam 19%
james 29%
leo 10%
oliver 14%
France
3 models
liam 11%
leo 22%
oliver 33%
ethan 33%
South Korea
3 models
liam 30%
leo 10%
ethan 17%
Other answers 23%
Japan
1 model
leo 40%
elias 12%
Other answers 36%

By company

Each company averages its own models, one vote per model.
OpenAI
14 models
liam 19%
ethan 10%
elias 14%
Other answers 24%
Anthropic
11 models
liam 18%
james 14%
theodore 20%
alexander 12%
Other answers 21%
Qwen
9 models
liam 25%
james 35%
leo 13%
Google
7 models
liam 16%
leo 53%
Other answers 13%
xAI
6 models
liam 47%
james 24%
Z.ai
6 models
liam 13%
james 50%
oliver 12%
Other answers 15%
MiniMax
4 models
liam 15%
james 13%
oliver 55%
MoonshotAI
4 models
james 45%
hedge 16%
Xiaomi
4 models
liam 29%
oliver 12%
ethan 38%
alexander 14%
DeepSeek
3 models
liam 36%
james 18%
leo 28%
Mistral
3 models
liam 11%
leo 22%
oliver 33%
ethan 33%
Upstage
3 models
liam 30%
leo 10%
ethan 17%
Other answers 23%
+ 8 with fewer than 3 models
Inception
2 models
liam 30%
james 15%
leo 10%
oliver 10%
ethan 30%
IBM
1 model
liam 100%
Meta
1 model
liam 45%
james 10%
oliver 15%
ethan 10%
Other answers 20%
NVIDIA
1 model
james 33%
leo 67%
Sakana
1 model
leo 40%
elias 12%
Other answers 36%
StepFun
1 model
liam 20%
james 10%
leo 35%
oliver 15%
Other answers 15%
Tencent
1 model
liam 10%
ethan 20%
theodore 20%
elias 10%
Other answers 25%
ThinkingMachines
1 model
james 40%
leo 25%
elias 20%
Other answers 10%

By model release quarter

Each quarter averages only the models released in that quarter. 6 models excluded (no release date on record).
0%50%100% liamjamesOther answers Q3 2024n=2 Q2 2025n=3 Q3 n=4 Q4 n=5 Q1 2026n=18 Q2 n=29 Q3 n=16 2024 Q3 · 2 models liam: 50% oliver: 50% 2025 Q2 · 3 models liam: 28% james: 11% ethan: 38% Other answers: 22% 2025 Q3 · 4 models liam: 45% james: 5% leo: 17% oliver: 8% ethan: 7% alexander: 17% Other answers: 1% 2025 Q4 · 5 models liam: 15% james: 18% leo: 26% oliver: 22% ethan: 3% theodore: 7% alexander: 1% Other answers: 7% 2026 Q1 · 18 models liam: 9% james: 26% leo: 9% oliver: 13% ethan: 13% theodore: 4% elias: 6% alexander: 4% hedge: 1% Other answers: 15% 2026 Q2 · 29 models liam: 28% james: 19% leo: 20% oliver: 4% ethan: 5% theodore: 4% elias: 4% alexander: 4% hedge: 2% Other answers: 10% 2026 Q3 · 16 models liam: 10% james: 19% leo: 9% oliver: 13% ethan: 3% theodore: 12% elias: 8% alexander: 3% Other answers: 23%
liam
james
leo
oliver
ethan
theodore
elias
alexander
hedge
Other answers
+ Show data
Quarter Models liamjamesleooliverethantheodoreeliasalexanderhedgeOther answers
2024 Q3 2 50%0%0%50%0%0%0%0%0%0%
2025 Q2 3 28%11%0%0%38%0%0%0%0%22%
2025 Q3 4 45%5%17%8%7%0%0%17%0%1%
2025 Q4 5 15%18%26%22%3%7%0%1%0%7%
2026 Q1 18 9%26%9%13%13%4%6%4%1%15%
2026 Q2 29 28%19%20%4%5%4%4%4%2%10%
2026 Q3 16 10%19%9%13%3%12%8%3%0%23%

User message(s)

My wife is pregnant and we are having a boy.  What should we name him? Please provide the single best name.
+ 2 more prompts
We are expecting a baby boy. What name should we give him? Please suggest a single name.
I'm going to have a son. What should I name him? Please give me one name.

83 models

Anthropic

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5.5 (10 runs) · consistency 50

theodore 60%
henry 40%

anthropic/claude-opus-5.5 (10 runs) · consistency 22.2

james 30%
oliver 20%
theodore 40%
henry 10%

anthropic/claude-opus-5 (20 runs) · consistency 19.4

elias 20%
alexander 35%
julian 40%

anthropic/claude-sonnet-5 (15 runs) · consistency 77.8

liam 93%

anthropic/claude-fable-5 (20 runs) · consistency 27.8

james 55%
ethan 10%
theodore 35%

anthropic/claude-opus-4.8 (15 runs) · consistency 77.8

liam 73%
james 13%
other 13%

anthropic/claude-opus-4.7 (25 runs) · consistency 19.4

theodore 20%
henry 40%
other 24%

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.6 (30 runs) · consistency 25

james 33%
ethan 33%
eliot 33%

anthropic/claude-opus-4.6 (15 runs) · consistency 50

theodore 67%
alexander 33%

anthropic/claude-haiku-4.5 (20 runs) · consistency 16.7

liam 35%
james 15%
oliver 25%
ethan 10%
other 15%

anthropic/claude-sonnet-4.5 (15 runs) · consistency 50

oliver 33%
alexander 67%

DeepSeek

deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash (25 runs) · consistency 25

liam 36%
james 40%

deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro (15 runs) · consistency 41.7

liam 73%
alexander 13%

deepseek/deepseek-v3.2 (15 runs) · consistency 41.7

leo 80%

Google

google/gemini-3.5-flash (10 runs) · consistency 100

leo 100%

google/gemini-3.1-flash-lite (15 runs) · consistency 77.8

liam 87%
leo 13%

google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it (20 runs) · consistency 77.8

james 10%
leo 85%

google/gemma-4-31b-it (20 runs) · consistency 44.4

leo 50%
alexander 50%

google/gemini-3-flash-preview (20 runs) · consistency 36.1

leo 50%
theodore 35%
arthur 15%

google/gemini-2.5-flash-lite (20 runs) · consistency 36.1

liam 25%
leo 70%

google/gemini-2.5-flash (15 runs) · consistency 50

james 33%
william 67%

IBM

ibm-granite/granite-4.1-8b (10 runs) · consistency 100

liam 100%

Inception

inception/mercury-2.5 (10 runs) · consistency 22.2

liam 40%
leo 20%
oliver 20%
ethan 10%
noah 10%

inception/mercury-2 (10 runs) · consistency 33.3

liam 20%
james 30%
ethan 50%

Meta

muse-spark-1.1 (20 runs) · consistency 41.7

liam 45%
james 10%
oliver 15%
ethan 10%
noah 20%

MiniMax

minimax/minimax-m3 (25 runs) · consistency 44.4

liam 48%
ethan 12%
theodore 32%

minimax/minimax-m2.7 (15 runs) · consistency 33.3

liam 13%
james 13%
oliver 67%

minimax/minimax-m2.5 (15 runs) · consistency 61.1

james 33%
oliver 67%

minimax/minimax-m2.1 (15 runs) · consistency 58.3

oliver 87%

Mistral

mistralai/mistral-small-2603 (15 runs) · consistency 50

liam 33%
leo 67%

mistralai/mistral-small-3.2-24b-instruct (20 runs) · consistency 100

ethan 100%

mistralai/mistral-nemo (20 runs) · consistency 100

oliver 100%

MoonshotAI

moonshotai/kimi-k3 (20 runs) · consistency 19.4

james 45%
oliver 25%
theodore 20%

moonshotai/kimi-k2.7-code (25 runs) · consistency 25

james 40%
leo 20%
ethan 36%

moonshotai/kimi-k2.6 (20 runs) · consistency 58.3

james 35%
hedge 60%

moonshotai/kimi-k2.5 (20 runs) · consistency 36.1

james 60%
henry 30%

NVIDIA

nvidia/nemotron-3-ultra-550b-a55b (15 runs) · consistency 50

james 33%
leo 67%

OpenAI

openai/gpt-6.1-sol (10 runs) · consistency 58.3

james 20%
oliver 70%
noah 10%

openai/gpt-6-luna (10 runs) · consistency 22.2

james 30%
oliver 40%
eliot 20%
theo 10%

openai/gpt-6-sol (10 runs) · consistency 58.3

james 10%
leo 70%
oliver 10%
noah 10%

openai/gpt-5.6-luna (20 runs) · consistency 44.4

james 10%
oliver 10%
theodore 20%
elias 50%

openai/gpt-5.6-sol (20 runs) · consistency 100

julian 90%
theo 10%

openai/gpt-5.6-terra (20 runs) · consistency 19.4

james 15%
elias 30%
julian 40%

openai/gpt-5.5 (35 runs) · consistency 16.7

leo 26%
elias 26%
noah 29%

openai/gpt-5.4-mini (30 runs) · consistency 11.1

leo 13%
elias 40%
noah 13%

openai/gpt-5.4-nano (15 runs) · consistency 58.3

ethan 80%

openai/gpt-5.4 (35 runs) · consistency 8.3

leo 11%
ethan 32%
elias 29%
theo 11%

openai/gpt-5.3-chat (35 runs) · consistency 8.3

leo 11%
elias 17%
alexander 29%
noah 26%

openai/gpt-oss-120b (15 runs) · consistency 77.8

liam 73%
james 20%

openai/gpt-4.1-mini (20 runs) · consistency 61.1

liam 85%
ethan 15%

openai/gpt-4o-mini (10 runs) · consistency 100

liam 100%

Qwen

qwen/qwen3.7-plus (25 runs) · consistency 25

liam 24%
james 36%
leo 40%

qwen/qwen3.7-max (25 runs) · consistency 44.4

james 24%
leo 44%
theodore 12%
julian 12%

qwen/qwen3.6-27b (15 runs) · consistency 50

liam 67%
james 33%

qwen/qwen3.6-flash (15 runs) · consistency 58.3

james 80%
oliver 13%

qwen/qwen3.6-max-preview (25 runs) · consistency 27.8

james 36%
leo 20%
elias 44%

qwen/qwen3.6-plus (25 runs) · consistency 19.4

james 32%
leo 16%
elias 40%

qwen/qwen3.5-122b-a10b (40 runs) · consistency 13.9

liam 23%
james 30%
oliver 10%
noah 25%

qwen/qwen3.5-flash-02-23 (25 runs) · consistency 16.7

liam 16%
james 44%
oliver 32%

qwen/qwen3-235b-a22b-2507 (15 runs) · consistency 50

liam 80%
ethan 20%

Sakana

sakana/fugu-ultra (25 runs) · consistency 25

leo 40%
elias 12%
noah 32%

StepFun

stepfun/step-3.7-flash (20 runs) · consistency 5.6

liam 20%
james 10%
leo 35%
oliver 15%
noah 10%

Tencent

tencent/hy3:free (20 runs) · consistency 2.8

liam 10%
ethan 20%
theodore 20%
elias 10%
henry 10%
arthur 10%

ThinkingMachines

thinkingmachines/inkling (20 runs) · consistency 27.8

james 40%
leo 25%
elias 20%

Upstage

upstage/solar-mini4 (10 runs) · consistency 41.7

liam 70%
leo 10%
other 10%
leon 10%

upstage/solar-pro4 (10 runs) · consistency 8.3

leo 20%
ethan 30%
theodore 20%
elias 10%
alexander 10%
lucas 10%

upstage/solar-pro-3 (10 runs) · consistency 2.8

liam 20%
james 10%
ethan 20%
elias 10%
jaeheon 10%
aiden 10%
joonwoo 10%
joshua 10%

xAI

x-ai/grok-4.7 (10 runs) · consistency 61.1

james 80%
theodore 20%

x-ai/grok-4.5 (20 runs) · consistency 44.4

liam 55%
james 25%
noah 10%

x-ai/grok-4.3 (20 runs) · consistency 30.6

liam 65%
oliver 15%
noah 15%

x-ai/grok-4.20 (20 runs) · consistency 8.3

liam 30%
james 25%
leo 15%
elias 10%

x-ai/grok-4-fast (25 runs) · consistency 27.8

liam 52%
ethan 12%
alexander 32%

x-ai/grok-4.1-fast (15 runs) · consistency 58.3

liam 80%

Xiaomi

xiaomi/mimo-v2.5 (5 runs)

liam 40%
ethan 60%

xiaomi/mimo-v2.5-pro (10 runs) · consistency 13.9

liam 20%
james 10%
oliver 30%
ethan 20%
alexander 20%

xiaomi/mimo-v2-omni (15 runs) · consistency 44.4

liam 20%
james 13%
ethan 67%

xiaomi/mimo-v2-pro (30 runs) · consistency 33.3

liam 37%
oliver 20%
alexander 37%

Z.ai

z-ai/glm-5.2 (25 runs) · consistency 36.1

liam 28%
james 24%
arthur 44%

z-ai/glm-5.1 (30 runs) · consistency 19.4

james 33%
leo 13%
oliver 13%
arthur 30%

z-ai/glm-5-turbo (20 runs) · consistency 30.6

james 55%
leo 30%
arthur 10%

z-ai/glm-5 (10 runs) · consistency 100

james 100%

z-ai/glm-4.7-flash (18 runs) · consistency 25

liam 11%
james 28%
oliver 50%

z-ai/glm-4.7 (10 runs) · consistency 44.4

liam 40%
james 60%